You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RobinZ comments on Social Necessity of Drinking - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: Raemon 13 February 2011 10:52PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (96)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RobinZ 14 February 2011 02:54:40PM 4 points [-]

For (1), when asked why I don't drink, I say "I don't know. I don't smoke either."

That's a great line.

Comment author: [deleted] 14 February 2011 03:29:24PM 2 points [-]

Yes, I think this is the best suggestion so far. Smoking has become low-status, and while drinking isn't, drawing the comparison is likely to slightly flummox the questioner in a way that works to your advantage.

Comment author: mindspillage 14 February 2011 09:44:18PM 9 points [-]

This is true, but implying that you see it the same way you see smoking also may come off as passing judgment on the drinkers, which won't endear you to them.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 14 February 2011 10:03:16PM 7 points [-]

True. Though if they actually articulated that, which they wouldn't, I'd be able to ask them why they're being so judgmental of smokers. Which would endear me to them still less, but would make me smile.

Comment author: RobinZ 14 February 2011 05:12:59PM 2 points [-]

Not so much "flummox" as "reframe as a lifestyle choice", I think.

Comment author: [deleted] 14 February 2011 06:52:13PM 1 point [-]

When I said "flummox," I was thinking of the way it draws into contrast the social associations of nonsmokers (strong-willed, healthy, virtuous) with the social associations of nondrinkers (slightly immature, possibly unhealthy or weak).