You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

alexflint comments on Settled questions in philosophy - Less Wrong Discussion

32 Post author: lukeprog 16 February 2011 06:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: alexflint 16 February 2011 12:39:48PM 2 points [-]

Fair enough. Out of interest, which ones did you disagree with?

Comment author: NihilCredo 17 February 2011 08:08:10AM *  0 points [-]

Nr. 3 (he hinges it on an rather unconvincing argument that time displacement - i.e. caring for your future self - is comparable to agent displacement - i.e. caring for someone else) and Nr. 5 (the argument is fine, but he's arguing against what I consider a strawman - it's not that without God morality disappears from the hyperuranian realm, it's that it loses a universal judge-enforcer which has some pretty harsh implications, especially for a materialist).

Comment author: Swimmy 18 February 2011 01:06:08AM 1 point [-]

I don't think it's a strawman. When you corner a theist on this point, she will often claim that god provides objective morality regardless of the existence of hell (or other punishments). They really are claiming that without God, morality disappears--hence the relativists can't justify anything schtick. And hence the standard non-answer to the Euthyphro dilemma, as opposed to simply admitting, "Yes, it's above him but he enforces it."

Comment author: gjm 21 February 2011 03:40:24PM 0 points [-]

hyperuranian

Hypouranian?

Comment author: NihilCredo 21 February 2011 04:06:19PM 0 points [-]

No, I did mean hyperuranian.

Comment author: gjm 22 February 2011 12:04:08AM 0 points [-]

Oh. But aren't we more interested in whether there's morality in the hypouranian realm? Below the heavens, rather than above? I mean, imagine a theist (maybe it had better be a deist) who believes that God exists and determines moral values -- but only for other gods. If convinced that God doesn't exist after all, she might feel that morality had disappeared from the hyperuranian realm, but why would she care?

Comment author: NihilCredo 22 February 2011 09:35:23AM 0 points [-]

Hyperuranian realm = the world of ideas, as opposed to the world of physical matter. The proposition that blogger is attacking is that, without God, morality would lose its value as a concept. Quote:

it's daft to think that God's existence is necessary to ground normative ideals, because the whole point of ideals is that they float free from the mess of our actual reality.

Comment author: gjm 22 February 2011 07:27:14PM 0 points [-]

Aha, gotcha. Thanks.