You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JGWeissman comments on Making money with Bitcoin? - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: Clippy 16 February 2011 07:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (119)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JGWeissman 02 March 2011 12:39:13AM 0 points [-]

What is the social process for making this sort of decision? What recourse is available to dissenters? You can fork an open source software project, but you can't fork an economy.

Comment author: lsparrish 02 March 2011 04:33:47AM 2 points [-]

Essentially you would have to convince holders of more than 50% of the computing power to upgrade to the new version in order to change the way it works. Most likely this wouldn't be easily possible without holding the number of coins below the original maximum.

Alternatively, various bitcoin clones could pop up, and one of them might take over the market just because it is better in some respect (e.g. more secure, faster, or easier to use). In fact there's no inherent reason there couldn't be thousands of novel currencies competing and trading against each other.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 02 March 2011 12:44:54AM *  2 points [-]

Sure you can. It just isn't very pretty. That's a major reason why governments generally like to control currency. Forking currency can be quite bad. The good news is that when one doesn't have physical currency having two different cryptographic currencies in circulation shouldn't be hard to deal with. One could even imagine software the converts between them nearly seamlessly.

Comment author: JGWeissman 02 March 2011 12:51:37AM 5 points [-]

Well, I said "you can't fork an economy", which I still think is true, but you make a good point that forking the currency is possible and may be good enough.