You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on Social ethics vs decision theory - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: AlexMennen 20 February 2011 04:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 20 February 2011 02:19:59PM 2 points [-]

There are a lot of different sorts of utilitarianism, and I'm not sure that all of them would lead to choosing not to have children. What's your line of thought that utilitarianism would lead to sterility?

Also, it wouldn't surprise me if many people who call themselves utilitarians actually mean they're more utilitarian than most people rather than that they're absolutely utilitarian. People (especially non-geeks) are very good at resilience in the face of memes.

Signaling might be even cruder and stupider than you imagine. How about "it's better to sound as though one has a highly intellectual system of ethics"?

Comment author: timtyler 20 February 2011 02:31:08PM *  2 points [-]

What's your line of thought that utilitarianism would lead to sterility?

If you have a choice between feeding your kids and feeding someone elses, usually the other person's needs will be greater than your own. Even if you want to make more utilitarians, much the same applies.

More generally, the "memetic hijcking" model diverts resources from genes to memes - often leading to compromised fertility.

How about "it's better to sound as though one has a highly intellectual system of ethics"?

Something like that probably explains a lot of interest in morality in general. There are also things like: look how much time I have to spend on things not involving finding my next meal.