You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nornagest comments on Age, fluid intelligence, and intelligent posts - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: InquilineKea 20 February 2011 09:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (50)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nornagest 21 February 2011 06:31:21AM 1 point [-]

That's a bit of a surprise, considering the oft-cited links between mathematics and music and the well-publicized math prodigies out there. One possible explanation might be that an apparent prodigy in math is something different from a prodigy in music; that fluid intelligence lets you pick up the technical skills to be writing symphonies as a teenager, but that writing engaging and expressive music requires an additional, different skillset that's more reliant on crystallized intelligence.

I'm not a classical music buff, but I've heard that Mozart's childhood work, for example, wasn't very good. Certainly not in comparison with his later stuff.