You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

AndrewHickey comments on What are you working on? - Less Wrong Discussion

23 Post author: jsalvatier 04 March 2011 01:33AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (103)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 March 2011 03:49:12PM 2 points [-]

I'm making about fifty pounds a month from the two books' combined sales on Lulu - most of that from sales of ebooks, actually (I've been hampered by Lulu having poor ePub processing software, so I can't get the ePub of Sci-Ence! uploaded as yet, but am selling a surprising number of PDFs). I also got my books uploaded as Kindle books last month, and have made about fifty pounds so far from those (averaging one sale a day when I have them at $5, and three sales per day when I have them at $1).

So assuming sales stay more-or-less level that means I can average £50 per month per book without any kind of promotion other than my blog. However, I'm hoping that by increasing the number of books I have available (and by having them in niche markets - both my books have topped the Kindle charts for their respective categories, despite low sales) I'll get some kind of name recognition. It only needs one breakout success and I can make a significant amount of money. (There are people selling hundreds of thousands of self-published books a month, but they're primarily writing pseudo-Twilight 'dark fantasy', and I have too much sense of shame to do that ;) ).

I hope the Beach Boys one might be successful, especially since I have some name recognition within the BB-fan community (I was very active in online fandom in the late 90s and early 2000s).

(I slightly miswrote earlier, BTW - there is one career-retrospective look at the Beach Boys' music. Mine is significantly more in-depth.)