You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vlodermolt comments on How best to show dying is bad - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: Zvi 08 March 2011 03:18PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (70)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Vlodermolt 10 March 2011 12:26:24AM *  0 points [-]

If a person wants to die, then why wait?

But seriously, you can solve the problem of #3 and #4 by using stem cells to make your brain divide forever, and use computers to store your memory in perfect condition, since brain cells gradually die off.

The problem is... what is "you"? How do you determine whether you are still yourself after a given period of time? Does my solution actually constitute a solution?

Shouldn't we be focusing on a way to scientifically quantify the soul before making ourselves immortal? On second thought, that might not be the best idea.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 10 March 2011 12:34:43AM 1 point [-]

How do you determine whether you are still yourself after a given period of time?

Well, how do you do it now?

For my own part, I don't think the question means anything. I will change over time; I have already changed over time. As long as the transitions are relatively gradual, there won't be any complaints on that score.