= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
timtyler comments on How SIAI could publish in mainstream cognitive science journals - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (76)
Or maybe the mainstream philosophy journals (isn't that the pre-internet term for a blog?) should get on line, and start using a state-of-the-art interactive discussion system.
It's pretty common these days for people to publish early drafts of their papers on their blog for commentary, and then they submit them to the journals. The philosophy world is highly interactive now, by way of the web.
Is there some sort of philosophical/humanities counterpart to arXiv.org?
Not really, just Google Scholar.
hrrmph. http://philpapers.org/