You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Dorikka comments on Tweetable Rationality - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: Alexandros 12 March 2011 08:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Dorikka 12 March 2011 09:05:41PM *  0 points [-]

If a man proves too clearly and convincingly to himself . . . that a tiger is an optical illusion--well, he will find out he is wrong. The tiger will himself intervene in the discussion, in a manner which will be in every sense conclusive.

~G. K. Chesterton

Edit: I noticed that this was more than 140 characters, but it works fine for Facebook.

Comment author: erratio 12 March 2011 11:54:13PM 0 points [-]

If a man convinces himself that a tiger is an illusion, the tiger himself will intervene in a conclusive manner

Not the most elegant rewording - anyone got anything better?

Comment author: lsparrish 13 March 2011 03:35:58AM 2 points [-]

If you see a tiger and convince yourself that it's an illusion, the tiger can still object -- very convincingly. #rationality

Tweeted.

Comment author: atucker 13 March 2011 02:20:03AM *  1 point [-]

If you see a tiger and convince yourself that it's an illusion, the tiger can still object. Very convincingly.

Or, using more of the original words.

After a man convinces himself that a tiger is an illusion, he will find out that he's wrong when the tiger conclusively intervenes.

Comment author: Dorikka 13 March 2011 03:17:35AM 3 points [-]

More direct, more deviation from original quote:

If you see a tiger and convince yourself that it's an illusion, you may be evicted from the gene pool.

Comment author: Alexandros 13 March 2011 08:00:19AM 1 point [-]

This made me laugh, combined with all the other positive feedback, let's make it the inaugural tweet of @rationalitweet

Comment author: atucker 17 March 2011 11:00:29PM 0 points [-]

When are you doing the next tweet?

Comment author: Alexandros 18 March 2011 08:38:02AM 0 points [-]

I just tweeted the most voted item here, but given the limited uptake of this page, I don't see this idea becoming self-sustaining. Interested in taking the reins of the account?

Comment author: atucker 18 March 2011 11:01:32PM 0 points [-]

Maybe just run the thread once a week in the discussion or something?

Comment author: Alexandros 18 March 2011 11:40:11PM 0 points [-]

I'm just not sure how much demand for it there is.

Comment author: atucker 13 March 2011 03:25:01AM 1 point [-]

I found this one a lot funnier and more memorable.

The only downside I can think of is that it might increase inferential distance. Maybe. I feel like most people would still understand it.