You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

othercriteria comments on Bayesianism in the face of unknowns - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: rstarkov 12 March 2011 08:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: othercriteria 13 March 2011 02:38:09PM 0 points [-]

The description of the coin flips having a Binomial(n=?,p) distribution, instead of a Bernoulli(p) distribution, might be a cause of the mis-reading.

Comment author: rstarkov 13 March 2011 08:07:10PM *  0 points [-]

Perhaps - obviously each coin is flipped just once, i.e. Binomial(n=1,p), which is the same thing as Bernoulli(p). I was trying to point out that for any other n it would work the same as a normal coin, if someone were to keep flipping it.