You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

bentarm comments on Project Ideas for the London Hackday - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Alexandros 20 March 2011 10:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (31)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bentarm 21 March 2011 06:44:27PM 1 point [-]

Time to crunch some numbers: ~250 sequences posts at 5 minutes each makes 20 hours of work in reposting the sequences manually.

Since you reckon this could be done by two people in a day, I guess that's less than 20 hours' work: added to the fact that writing the bot is almost certainly more fun than copy-pasting the sequence, it looks like the bot gets my vote.

Comment author: Alexandros 22 March 2011 11:37:25AM 0 points [-]

Just to pick a nit, I am under the impression that there are much more than 250 posts in the sequences given that Eliezer posted daily for about two years. (Of course we could stop speculating and count, but I can't be bothered) That would move the estimation much more in favour of a bot, but if its only feature is to save 40-50 hours, maybe there is something else we could do that simply isn't doable by humanpower.

Comment author: taryneast 22 March 2011 09:53:12AM *  0 points [-]

Not only that, but 20 hours in one stretch is much easier than 20 hours stretched over however many months... making sure of a consistency that invariant with mood, sleeping-in and natural disasters... bots are much better at the latter.