David_Gerard comments on Size of the smallest recursively self-improving AI? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (47)
I'll credit that. A baby is a machine for going FOOM.
(Specifically, I'd guess, because so much has to be left out to produce a size of offspring that can be born without killing the mother too often. Hence the appalling, but really quite typical of evolution, hack of having the human memepool be essential to the organism expressed by the genes growing right.)
How much larger do you estimate babies would be if they came pre-installed with the information they appallingly lack?
Presumably at least with a more fully-developed brain. It does quite a bit of growing in the first couple of years.