You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

alexflint comments on Size of the smallest recursively self-improving AI? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: alexflint 30 March 2011 11:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: alexflint 02 April 2011 10:42:33AM 1 point [-]

Completely agree with paras 1 and 2.

However, It does seem that we talk about "hard take-off scenario caused by recursively self-improving intelligence" often enough to warrant a convenience term to mean just that. Much of the discussion about cascades, cycles, insights, AI-boxes, resource overhangs etc are specific to the recursive self-improvement scenario, and not to, e.g. the cache of Ancient tech scenario.