You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Kenoubi comments on An Anchoring Experiment - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: prase 01 April 2011 02:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (83)

Comments (83)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Kenoubi 01 April 2011 04:11:26PM 1 point [-]

Err, I think I screwed this up. I thought if you were in group I for the first part, you'd also be in group I for the second part. I still think this would be more intuitive (just reverse the questions in part 2).

Comment author: prase 01 April 2011 04:22:11PM *  0 points [-]

I still think this would be more intuitive (just reverse the questions in part 2).

Perhaps, but I am not going to change it now when several answers have been already collected.

Comment author: Kenoubi 01 April 2011 08:03:01PM 0 points [-]

Sure, I wasn't suggesting you should. Given the current situation, I'd change

The second part is completely analogical to the first one, only with a different question. If you have participated in the first part within the group I, take part in the group II for the second part, and vice versa.

to

Use the opposite group in the second part, which is completely analogical to the first one, only with a different question.

I probably would have tried to use bulleted lists and/or bold to make the text more scannable overall. But maybe my error was atypical and all this isn't necessary.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit