You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

paulfchristiano comments on Anthropics in a Tegmark Multiverse - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: paulfchristiano 02 April 2011 06:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (41)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: paulfchristiano 02 April 2011 11:10:36PM 0 points [-]

Shortest explanation for my thoughts. Precisely a simplicity prior on my brain. There is nothing about universe complexity.

I believe that the shortest explanation for my thoughts is the one that says "Here is the universe. Within the universe, here is this dude." This is a valid explanation for my brain, and it gets longer if I have to modify it to make my brain "simpler" in the sense you are using, not shorter.

Comment author: Manfred 02 April 2011 11:29:15PM *  0 points [-]

No, it doesn't. Picking between microstates isn't a "modification" of the universe, it's simply talking about the observed probability of something that already happens all the time.

Although now that I think about it, this argument should apply to more traditional anthropics as well, if a simplicity prior is used. And since I've done this experiment a few times now, I can say with high confidence that a strong simplicity prior is incorrect when flipping coins (especially when anthropically flipping coins [which means I did it myself]), and a maximum entropy prior is very close to correct.