You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jimrandomh comments on Cryptanalysis as Epistemology? (paging cryptonerds) - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: SilasBarta 06 April 2011 07:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (42)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimrandomh 07 April 2011 07:17:47PM 3 points [-]

It has always perplexed me how WWII US cryptographers managed to get anything done, when the plaintext still looks like gibberish -- further complicated by a novel encoding betweeen a non-western script and EM signals.

I believe the Germans had a policy of starting every message with some standard boilerplate, so Allied cryptographers were usually able to perform known-plaintext attacks with only passive monitoring as long as they observed any one message while it was still unencrypted.

Comment author: Mystfan 08 April 2011 04:21:37PM 2 points [-]

Also the British cryptographers made a practice of "gardening"; before a German expedition was to depart, they'd mine an area so that they'd have known plaintext to work with. I imagine that helped a lot too.