You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

curi comments on Bayesian Epistemology vs Popper - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: curi 06 April 2011 11:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (226)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: curi 07 April 2011 03:03:25AM 0 points [-]

I do not find Popper hard to read.

Popper never fully gave an explanation of how to distinguish between strict falsification theory and his notions.

Did you read his later books? He does explain his position. One distinguishing difference is that Popper is not a justificationist and they are. Tell me if you don't know what that means.