You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

benelliott comments on Bayesian Epistemology vs Popper - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: curi 06 April 2011 11:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (226)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: benelliott 07 April 2011 12:40:43PM *  0 points [-]

I don't know if these are what you're looking for but:

Probability Theory: The Logic of Science by Jaynes, spends its first chapter explaining why we need a 'calculus of plausibility' and what such a calculus should hope to achieve. The rest of the book is mostly about setting it up and showing what it can do. (The link does not contain the whole book, only the first few chapters, you may need to buy or borrow it to get the rest).

Yudkowsky's Technical explanation, which assumes the reader is already familiar with the theorem, explains some of its implications for scientific thinking in general.

Comment author: David_Gerard 07 April 2011 01:29:13PM 1 point [-]

See here for what I see the absence of. There's a hole that needs filling here.