= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Peterdjones comments on Bayesian Epistemology vs Popper - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (226)
You are complaining it is not a deduction of Bayes from no assumpyions whatever. But all it needs to be is that those assumptions can be made to "work"--ie applied without con tradiction, qoudliber or other disaster.
Remember, Popper himself said it all starts with common sense.