You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Unnamed comments on Controls and bias - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: a363 11 April 2011 04:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Unnamed 11 April 2011 05:25:22PM 2 points [-]

There is research on this question, the keywords to look for are "lay theories" or "naive theories".

One approach is to measure people's naive theories (e.g., by asking people if they believe that X causes Y), to see if they are correlated with the outcome Y when X is present. Some people hold the belief that X causes Y more strongly than others, and this takes advantage of that variability to test if the strength of the belief is associated with the outcome.

Another approach is to manipulate people's beliefs (e.g. by telling them that scientific research has shown that X is unrelated to Y) and see if that changes the outcome Y (when X occurs).

In some cases, it's possible to make people believe that X occurred when it really did not; in that case researchers can use the same methodology as a placebo control study.