You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

atucker comments on Link: Why and how to debate charitably - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: RobinZ 14 April 2011 04:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: atucker 14 April 2011 11:31:17PM *  6 points [-]

Nice link, thanks for sharing.

Normal, non-argumentative conversation is a good place to practice noticing misunderstandings. (Just stuff like assumptions about who's going where, when something is taking place, or where people are starting from) Since the participants aren't trying to win an argument, its easier to take a step back and realize that you're not on the same page. Doing this a few times makes it easier to do in "arguments".

If you're talking with someone with a similar inferential landscape as you and it seems like they're talking about something completely different, there's a pretty good chance that they're talking about something completely different.

And if they're not inferentially close, you're really probably talking about different things. Mind the gap.