You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Eneasz comments on How Many of Me Are There? - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Eneasz 15 April 2011 07:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (42)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eneasz 16 April 2011 06:47:26PM *  0 points [-]

I would never have guessed that one of the side effects of the computational paradigm of mind would be a new form of proxy immortalism

Odd, this was one of the first things that occurred to me when I learned of it.

it's still ironic to see this argument being made, given that it emerges from the same techno-conceptual zeitgeist which elsewhere is employed to urge a person not to be satisfied with living on in their children, their race, et cetera, but rather to seek personal survival beyond the traditional limits

I am actually already signed up with CI, so I'm not solely satisfied with my greater-self continuing on. But I also realize the two are related - if/when I am revived, the measure of meta-me is increased. Also, once reanimation becomes possible, I would work toward getting everyone revived regardless of who they are or how much it costs. As such, increasing the number of people sufficiently like me (ie: the measure of meta-me) increases my chances of being revived, and also is healthy for meta-me.

I'm curious if a meta-being having awareness of it's own existence is a competitive advantage. I'd wager it's not, but it'll be interesting to see.

It may seem like a confused form of thinking, but I have come to accept that I have a very mystically-oriented thought process. I prefer to think of Azathoth and Alethea as beings, even though I know they are not. Struggling against evolution is hopeless, but holding back Azathoth for the good of man is noble. I find that I am both happier in life and more able to do useful things in the real world when I think in terms of metaphor. So while meta-beings may be no more than a useful mental construct, the same can be said of many things such as "life" and "particles". If it makes winning more achievable it's worth embracing, or at least exploring.

Comment author: randallsquared 19 April 2011 12:58:26PM 2 points [-]

I would never have guessed that one of the side effects of the computational paradigm of mind would be a new form of proxy immortalism

Odd, this was one of the first things that occurred to me when I learned of it.

I actually had the opposite reaction, wondering if the me of next year was close enough to be the same person. I have a tendency toward a high future discount in any case, and this didn't help. :)