Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

DanielLC comments on Nonsuperintelligent AI threat - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: PlaidX 18 April 2011 09:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (10)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DanielLC 19 April 2011 12:23:46AM 1 point [-]

I'm not sure this would be a bad thing. It could be used to test code for vulnerabilities. Any code resistant to it won't be hurt by it, and it's less likely to be hurt by human hackers.

Comment author: orthonormal 19 April 2011 02:02:42PM 1 point [-]

Surely it's a bad thing, compared to something which tests our code without destroying/reappropriating anything it infects.

Comment author: DanielLC 19 April 2011 07:49:54PM 0 points [-]

It only destroys that copy. It shouldn't do much damage in the wild, since everything will have already been tested against it.

Comment author: orthonormal 19 April 2011 08:30:57PM 0 points [-]

We're talking about risk scenarios. Of course there are positive uses for several dangerous technologies, but those who develop them should put thought into what would happen if they got loose in various ways.