You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

falenas108 comments on Leaving a line of retreat for theists - Less Wrong Discussion

10 [deleted] 23 April 2011 01:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: falenas108 23 April 2011 04:04:48AM 2 points [-]

Yes, this is what I believed for a while before I saw that Occam's razor showed that if a universe could exist entirely on its own without God, the hypothesis without a deity would be favored.

Comment author: MinibearRex 23 April 2011 04:19:24AM 5 points [-]

True. But you don't have to go all the way there in one talk. A shift from theism to deism is a step in the right direction.

Comment author: Desrtopa 25 April 2011 05:11:20PM 3 points [-]

Not necessarily. It can also be a shift away from receptiveness to evidence.

I haven't kept careful track of the paths taken by all the people I've known who've converted from theism to atheism (I sometimes wish I had,) but I have noted that it often comes as a result of taking their religions more seriously and seeing them as sets of beliefs with real factual implications, which should pay rent in anticipated experiences, and then realizing that they simply don't match up to reality. For some people, deism represents a retreat from ever having to think about the implications of their beliefs.