Could someone clarify "tribe"? Is it synonymous with "established LW meetup"?
If so, I don't know if I'll be much help. If Andrew wants to brave the MN cold, there's quite a few potential job options here: 3M, Honeywell, Boeing, BAE, Alliant Techsystems... I work at one of these and interned at another.
I'm considering MN to be low on the list, though (does 2 = tribe?); if so, then I'm not positive what I can offer as I haven't moved much and can't see being useful at finding out of state jobs.
If this moves to another medium (outside LW), I'd be happy to follow things over there and help if I can, though.
As an aside... I'll be in Pheonix, AZ memorial day weekend... don't know if you know anyone around there that you could go visit, but it'd be cool to meet you in person. I'm there for an in-law's graduation and won't have much travel leeway, unfortunately. Just thought I'd throw it out there...
Agree with jsalvatier's reply. Also, I think you could do a referral for 3M positions outside of MN. I probably wouldn't mind MN, if there were a tribe there, except maybe the distance from family. (I actually slightly prefer coldness and sweat easily from heat even when not tired, although maybe that's a thyroid issue I should resolve.)
(Andrew is a pseudonym because he is a little worried about showing up in an internet search; please respect that and do not use his real name when posting below).
Andrew is an established and valuable member (link to highest voted post) of the LessWrong community. Sadly, he is without a tribe; he lives in a relatively small city where he has not found a tribe to belong to despite considerable effort. Being part of a tribe would improve Andrew's life considerably. Andrew is not attached to the area and quite willing to leave, doesn't know how to taskify getting himself a tribe.
Big decisions like moving are often easier and better executed when made with outside input. Therefore, I am putting together a Special Relocation Task Force to aid his efforts.
Besides helping Andrew, I am also interested in answering the question 'will rationalists be good at this?'. They should be; rationalists should win. If they are not, something is wrong and I want to know about it. This experiment seems like a good way of answering that question.
Here are some basic facts about Andrew: