You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

AspiringRationalist comments on [SEQ RERUN] Some Claims Are Just Too Extraordinary - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: jake987722 27 April 2011 03:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (28)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AspiringRationalist 25 June 2012 03:12:58AM 0 points [-]

I distrust the betting model for extreme probabilities like this.

Can any of us really comprehend that much money? Frankly, I bet even Warren Buffet would have trouble; he has said after he gives away 99% of his wealth, he and his family will have all the money they will ever need. Does 100 times as much money as you'll ever need really feel different from 10x or 1000x?

The betting heuristic is useful because our intuitive sense for money has a much larger dynamic range than our intuitive sense of probability - it's easier to conceptualize "a subway ticket against a nice house" than "million to one odds", but "0.05 subway tickets against 25000 nice houses" doesn't really fit the way we think.