You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Giles comments on [Altruist Support] How to determine your utility function - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Giles 01 May 2011 06:33AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Giles 01 May 2011 03:14:07PM 1 point [-]

Agreed - I was too dismissive of what can be learnt from past decision-making experiences.

I was just pointing out that "I'm always timid in social situations therefore I want to be timid in social situations" is invalid reasoning.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 01 May 2011 03:24:11PM *  2 points [-]

"I'm always timid in social situations therefore I want to be timid in social situations" is invalid reasoning.

To a first approximation, and as a heuristic rule, it is valid. There are specific additional reasons to believe the conclusion invalid, and they have to do with things other than the way the initial faulty conclusion was generated. You believe the reasoning invalid because you know the conclusion to be invalid, but not the other way around.

Comment author: Giles 01 May 2011 03:45:05PM 1 point [-]

I meant "want" as in "this is one of my life goals; I would not wish to self-modify to be any other way"