= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
AndrewHickey comments on Sarah Connor and Existential Risk - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (77)
Yeah, sweet! Because nothing says "we deserve to make decisions about the future of humanity, and possibly of life in the universe" like murdering one's ideological enemies, does it? That is not the kind of thing one should even joke about.
It is not a joke, it is an observation of the possible OP intent.
I agree, he should delete the post.
The "Sweet!" made it appear as if you either endorsed that view or found it humorous rather than disturbing.
The last thing I want is a sectarian war between various research groups and organizations.
Religious wars of the past and present could be dwarfed by that. And even if not, bad enough.