You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nic_Smith comments on Climate change: existential risk? - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: katydee 06 May 2011 06:19AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (25)

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Nic_Smith 08 May 2011 03:59:37AM 1 point [-]

There's a related claim over at PredictionBook:

By 2100 it’s obvious to the average human that (1) Global warming is true and (2) it’s actually a good thing: Resulting in a better climate then we have had in recorded history. A stable Wet-Sahara/Warm-Siberia/No Rainforest scenario.

Out of four people that have expressed an opinion, I'm currently the only person there against this claim.

Comment author: sirswindon 17 January 2014 01:16:32AM -1 points [-]

Not to be the only one expressing the opinion that it is more than just a "wild card scenario" --- but I could construct a scenario where the majority of the population of the earth is exterminated by extreme climate change, i.e. global warming.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit