You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

asr comments on Climate change: existential risk? - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: katydee 06 May 2011 06:19AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: asr 17 January 2014 01:55:35AM 0 points [-]

There's already billions of dollars per year being spent on reducing carbon impacts, lower-CO2 electrical power generation, etc etc.

My guess would be that, if you wanted to reduce the risks of climate change, the right place to put resources is biotechnology. Bioengineered green plants seems like the most promising way to get CO2 out of the atmosphere (or equivalently, to produce carbon-neutral chemical fuels).

Here again, though, there's already a lot of smart people and billion dollar research budgets devoted to relevant problems. So I don't know if the marginal value of more work on the topic is high.