You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JoshuaZ comments on Why is my sister related to me only 50%? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: TimFreeman 06 May 2011 06:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (16)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 08 May 2011 01:58:12AM *  2 points [-]

Actually, it is clear that siblings share slightly more than 50%. This doesn't have to do with any fancy issues involving strange things in recombination. They have identical mitochondrial DNA.

Comment author: Alicorn 08 May 2011 02:59:48AM *  1 point [-]

So are half-siblings with the same mother more closely related than half-siblings with the same father? Or cousins with mothers who are sisters rather than mothers who are sisters-in-law?

Comment author: JoshuaZ 08 May 2011 03:14:00AM 1 point [-]

Yes, But this is very rarely relevant because the active part of mitochondrial DNA is almost identical for almost all humans.