You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

hairyfigment comments on Death Note, Anonymity, and Information Theory - Less Wrong Discussion

32 Post author: gwern 08 May 2011 03:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: hairyfigment 08 May 2011 08:21:32PM 0 points [-]

I more or less agree with you on point 1. A rational person could have reasoned in that way. But I think we have to say that Light did not. He wanted people to recognize his work when it came to killing apparent criminals because he wanted admiration as a goal in itself. This led to the most obviously avoidable mistake, #3.

Comment author: benelliott 08 May 2011 09:20:36PM 6 points [-]

I disagree, even in the very first episode he specifically outlines that part of his plan is that when people notice criminals are dying they will be less inclined to become criminals.

I wouldn't say #3 was that easily avoidable, I didn't see it coming myself, while in #4 it was all I could do to restrain myself from yelling 'idiot!' at the screen.

Comment author: hairyfigment 09 May 2011 02:57:55AM 0 points [-]

Yes, I believe that on the level of explicit reasoning he wants to kill criminals with heart attacks to deter crime (and use deaths of other kinds to secretly dispose of people who he thinks don't contribute). Then he gets agitated and kills Lind with a heart attack before verifying that he needs to kill Lind at all. This supports the theory that (like any other fascist dictator) he wants admiration and obedience more than a better world.