You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

timtyler comments on Rationalists don't care about the future - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: PhilGoetz 15 May 2011 07:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (143)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 17 May 2011 05:42:54PM *  1 point [-]

At best, this is an argument not to use non-exponential, translation invariant discounting.

It is an argument not to use non-exponential, discounting.

You can discount in a way that depends on time [...]

Exponential discounting depends on time. It is exponential temporal discounting being discussed. So: values being scaled by ke^-ct - where the t is for "time".

The prevailing interest rate is normally not much of a factor - since money is only instrumentally valuable.

or you can not discount at all.

That is the trivial kind of exponential discounting, where the exponent is zero.

I know of no such justification for exponential discounting. The wikipedia article does not provide one.

The bit I quoted was a justification. Exponential discounting yields time-consistent preferences. Only exponential discounting does that.