You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

XiXiDu comments on What bothers you about Less Wrong? - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: Will_Newsome 19 May 2011 10:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (160)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: XiXiDu 08 June 2011 11:36:29AM *  4 points [-]

first encountered humans who couldn't understand basic arithmetic at university

When I first saw a fraction, e.g. 1/4, I had real trouble to accept that it equals .25. I was like, "Uhm, why?"...when other people are like, "Okay, then by induction 2/4=.5"...it's not that I don't understand, but do not accept. Only when I learnt that .25 is a base-10 place-value notation, which really is an implicit fraction, with the denominator being a power of ten, I was beginning to accept that it works (it took a lot more actually, like understanding the concept of prime factorization etc.). Which might be a kind of stupidity, but not something that would prevent me from ever understanding mathematics.

The concept of a function is another example:

  • f:X->Y (Uhm, what?)
  • f(x) : X -> Y (Uhm, what?)
  • f(x) = x+1 (Hmm.)
  • f(1) = 1+1 (Okay.)
  • y = f(x) (Hmm.)
  • (x, y)
  • (x, f(x))
  • (1,2) (Aha, okay.)
  • (x,y) is an element of R (Hmm.)
  • R is a binary relation (Uhm, what?)
  • x is R-related to y (Oh.)
  • xRy
  • R(x,y) (Aha...)
  • R = (X, Y, G)
  • G is a subset of the Cartesian product X × Y (Uhm, what?)

...so it goes. My guess is that many people appear stupid because their psyche can't handle apparent self-evidence very well.