You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vladimir_Nesov comments on I want to save myself - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: DanArmak 20 May 2011 10:27AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 20 May 2011 06:39:29PM 3 points [-]

and having a net worth of at least n years worth of income.

Income is irrelevant, you measure this in typical level of spending.

Comment author: MixedNuts 20 May 2011 07:37:47PM 3 points [-]

No, it serves as a metric. Many people treat their income (or their income minus what they've decided to save) as a budget where they must fit expenses. (Except some rare expenses which are allowed to eat savings.) So "six months of income" is immediately grasped, whereas "six months of typical spending" requires computing your average expenses and hoping nothing unusual happens.

Comment author: MartinB 20 May 2011 10:29:02PM 2 points [-]

I think either number is fine. Ballparked. The better your financial tracking the more complicated the number can be.