You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Laoch comments on lessannoying.org - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Bongo 26 May 2011 08:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Laoch 27 May 2011 09:45:28AM 2 points [-]

He must think smart people are too smart to think. I'm reminded of the movie Limitless and how poor, less smart, people are at writing about smarter people. Spoiler: In the movie the protagonist takes out a loan from a loan shark so that he can make more money with his new found cognitive powers, but forgets to pay it back, even though he's both rich and more intelligent. The writer doesn't seem to have copped that the character would have increased thinking capacity. Wash rinse repeat for most sci-fi movies unfortunately. Likewise this article seems to make the assumption that smart people don't think about socialising. Btw is that mind projection fallacy?

Comment author: ata 27 May 2011 01:20:53PM *  5 points [-]

Are you thinking of normal psychological projection? I don't see anything very mind-projectiony about this.

Comment author: rysade 27 May 2011 09:52:27AM 1 point [-]

I think that might be cut-and-dry stereotyping.

Comment author: Laoch 27 May 2011 09:56:45AM 1 point [-]

The article or what I said?

Comment author: rysade 27 May 2011 10:17:30AM 3 points [-]

Sorry, I've been having a real big problem with specificity lately. I blame it on facebook.

You asked whether it might be mind-projection fallacy that caused him to assume that smart people are socially awkward. The article looks like it is being stereotypical rather than fallacious in some other way.

Of course I might just be projecting, here. :) I do consider myself to be smart, and I definitely try not to think much about socializing. Not that it's done me much good. I end up thinking about it anyway because that's the rational thing to do.

Comment author: Laoch 27 May 2011 10:21:39AM 1 point [-]

Yes stereo typing sounds more like it.

Comment author: wedrifid 27 May 2011 01:22:34PM 0 points [-]

The loan shark business seemed forced. Given the success he already had he just didn't need a loan from a loan shark. The loan shark didn't even give him that much cash. He couldn't have earned way, way more money than that in the time it took to round him up. At least, I could with that kind of intelligence boost.

Comment author: Laoch 27 May 2011 01:52:24PM 1 point [-]

That was my point.

Comment author: MixedNuts 27 May 2011 02:10:46PM 4 points [-]

Friendly neighborhood inferential distance surveyor: it sounded like your point was about forgetfulness, not taking the loan in the first place. In general, when you say "A, then B, even though C", it sounds like A is context-setting and B is what C should have prevented (as opposed to "C should have prevented A and B"). Except when it doesn't.

Comment author: wedrifid 27 May 2011 02:14:47PM 0 points [-]

That was my point.

Compatible with and complimentary to.