You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

torekp comments on What is/are the definition(s) of "Should"? - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Will_Sawin 01 June 2011 05:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: torekp 05 June 2011 12:25:23AM 1 point [-]

Are you disagreeing that Clippy and Snippy are dangerous? If not, accepting this statement adds no complexity to my view as compared to yours.

As for shouldness, many people don't make a distinction between "rationally should" and "morally should". And why should they; after all, for most there may be little divergence between the two. But the distinction is viable, in principle. And psychopaths, and those who have to deal with them, are usually well aware of it.

Comment author: Will_Sawin 05 June 2011 04:27:31AM 1 point [-]

If not, accepting this statement adds no complexity to my view as compared to yours.

I'm not sure what I mean by complicated.

And psychopaths, and those who have to deal with them, are usually well aware of it.

Exactly, I'm talking about the concept "should', not the word.