You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Minicamp Confidence Intervals

-16 [deleted] 02 June 2011 07:40PM

I predict, with 50% confidence, that this comment will have between +1 and +4 karma at 9 pm PST on 6/2/2011.

Comments (7)

Comment author: Kevin 03 June 2011 02:29:21AM 4 points [-]

Less Wrong hates it when you do things like this, definitely not.

Comment author: Dorikka 02 June 2011 08:57:10PM 2 points [-]

I think that your prediction affected the outcome. :D

Comment author: Lightwave 03 June 2011 09:06:23AM 2 points [-]

He probably thought he had predicted how his prediction will affect the outcome. :D

Comment author: prase 03 June 2011 11:09:16AM 1 point [-]

Better would be to predict that the comment will have, say, between -10 and 0 karma. Would the audience who dislike this type of comments downvote to hurt the author's karma, or upvote to frustrate his prediction?

(I am not going to do the experiment myself - the first time it is slightly amusing, the second time it would be annoying. But if somebody doesn't mind being annoying...)

Comment author: cwillu 03 June 2011 01:04:12PM 0 points [-]

We're really good at this sort of group coordination: -20 karma for sure :)

Comment author: prase 03 June 2011 02:10:31PM 0 points [-]

So modify: predict that the karma will be negative with 90% confidence.

Comment author: wedrifid 03 June 2011 11:29:43AM 0 points [-]

Better would be to predict that the comment will have, say, between -10 and 0 karma. Would the audience who dislike this type of comments downvote to hurt the author's karma, or upvote to frustrate his prediction?

I would downvote for annoyingness.