You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.
Comment author:prase
03 June 2011 11:09:16AM
1 point
[-]
Better would be to predict that the comment will have, say, between -10 and 0 karma. Would the audience who dislike this type of comments downvote to hurt the author's karma, or upvote to frustrate his prediction?
(I am not going to do the experiment myself - the first time it is slightly amusing, the second time it would be annoying. But if somebody doesn't mind being annoying...)
Comment author:wedrifid
03 June 2011 11:29:43AM
0 points
[-]
Better would be to predict that the comment will have, say, between -10 and 0 karma. Would the audience who dislike this type of comments downvote to hurt the author's karma, or upvote to frustrate his prediction?
Comments (7)
Less Wrong hates it when you do things like this, definitely not.
I think that your prediction affected the outcome. :D
He probably thought he had predicted how his prediction will affect the outcome. :D
Better would be to predict that the comment will have, say, between -10 and 0 karma. Would the audience who dislike this type of comments downvote to hurt the author's karma, or upvote to frustrate his prediction?
(I am not going to do the experiment myself - the first time it is slightly amusing, the second time it would be annoying. But if somebody doesn't mind being annoying...)
We're really good at this sort of group coordination: -20 karma for sure :)
So modify: predict that the karma will be negative with 90% confidence.
I would downvote for annoyingness.