You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Peterdjones comments on A Defense of Naive Metaethics - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: Will_Sawin 09 June 2011 05:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (294)

Comments (294)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Peterdjones 23 June 2011 01:37:48PM 1 point [-]

or rather [you should do X] = [the statement that, if believed, would cause one to do X if one were an ideal and completely non akrasic agent]

Comment author: Will_Sawin 23 June 2011 02:10:52PM 1 point [-]

Correct.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit