You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

David_Gerard comments on Scientific misconduct misdiagnosed because of scientific misconduct - Less Wrong Discussion

44 Post author: GLaDOS 10 June 2011 02:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: David_Gerard 11 June 2011 07:37:36AM *  -1 points [-]

Knowing that someone has substantial Ashkenazim ancestry lets you make many probabilistic predictions about both neutral and significant genetic variations

Yes, that's what I meant - they're an actually close-knit genetic group. "Negro" is not. "Black American" is a little closer, but not much (their African ancestors having been taken as slaves mostly from the west coast) - you'll see obviously highly selected-for factors, like black skin and sickle-cell.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 11 June 2011 01:48:28PM 1 point [-]

There are people who identify as black or who are identified as black under a "one drop" rule. This doesn't seem as though it would give huge amounts of information about associated traits.