You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

satt comments on N-back news: Jaeggi 2011, or, is there a psychologist/statistician in the house? - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: gwern 16 June 2011 06:47PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (22)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: satt 16 June 2011 11:38:08PM *  1 point [-]

The groups are ((16 high improvement+16 low improvement)+30 control), so why is it (15), t(15), t(30), and then later t(16)? Does t(n) not mean that it's a t statistic over a population of n?

Not usually. Numbers in brackets after a well-known statistic normally represent parameters for that statistic's distribution; in the case of a t-test the bracketed number would be the number of degrees of freedom, which might be one less than the sample size (for a one-sample t-test) or two less than the sum of sample sizes (for an equal variances two-sample t-test).

(Disclaimer: I haven't read the paper.)

[Edited for unambiguity.]

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 17 June 2011 02:21:17AM 0 points [-]

Yes, that sounds familiar. Thanks.