You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Manfred comments on Discussion: Socially Awkward Penguin as a tool for unraveling social enigmas - Less Wrong Discussion

23 Post author: Raw_Power 17 June 2011 12:52AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (99)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Manfred 17 June 2011 03:54:25PM *  1 point [-]

They do share intelligence and knowledge of the subject, and being able to break down your knowledge into parts is useful for a researcher too. I think requiring researchers to teach at least some undergraduate classes is a good idea, because it serves as a form of professional development, keeping them in touch with the basics and keeps them integrated in university life. Although there should be recourse if a researcher is a particularly bad teacher, normally they do quite well.

Comment author: Raw_Power 17 June 2011 04:31:06PM *  0 points [-]

In my experience university teachers really don't give a crap about the students understanding anything and think all the technical low-level calculaton grunt work is so beneath them it doesn't deserve any attention. Ask any of them to derivate a freaking tangent and watch them sweat.

Comment author: Manfred 17 June 2011 05:45:58PM 0 points [-]

What subject was taught by this professor who had trouble taking the derivative of a tangent?

Comment author: Raw_Power 17 June 2011 08:50:15PM 0 points [-]

Here is his page Guy is apparently a highlevel mather, but completely out of touch with peasant-level calculations, apparently.

Comment author: Manfred 17 June 2011 10:20:36PM 0 points [-]

Huh, I have never run into such a person, though I've run into a few professors who were bad teachers. But in your experience it's common: you say "In my experience university teachers really don't give a crap about the students understanding anything".

Is it really that common? Are you generalizing too much?

Maybe it's a difference between different countries. Have you read Richard Feynman's account of teaching in Brazil?

Comment author: Raw_Power 18 June 2011 02:07:13AM 0 points [-]

Nope. Do tell.

Comment author: Manfred 18 June 2011 02:34:18AM 1 point [-]

Well, in short, science education in Brazil was consistently terrible because it taught students to value memorization but not understanding. In long, you can read his account here.

Comment author: Raw_Power 18 June 2011 07:06:29AM 0 points [-]

So... like Japan?