You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vladimir_Nesov comments on Drive-less AIs and experimentation - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: whpearson 17 June 2011 02:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (14)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 19 June 2011 11:12:16PM *  1 point [-]

If you do not like the Red ball thing, feel free to invent another test, such as flipping a few bits on another computer.

No, it's the same. Specifying what a physical "computer" is is hard.

No as that would lead to an decrease in mutual information between the two models.

What is a "model"? How does one construct a model of the universe? How detailed must it be, whatever it is? What resources should be expended on making a more accurate model? Given two "models", how accurate must a calculation of mutual information be? What if it can't be accurate? What is the tradeoff between making it more accurate and not rewriting the universe with machinery for making it more accurate? Etc.