You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Raemon comments on Why No Wireheading? - Less Wrong Discussion

16 [deleted] 18 June 2011 11:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (112)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Raemon 19 June 2011 06:38:41PM *  2 points [-]

I know people who specifically said that if orgasmium were available, they'd take it in an instant. I also know people that would not. Wireheading doesn't have to be univerally, objectively "good" or "bad." If wireheading would satisfy all your values, and it becomes available to you, well, go for it.

I know that if I was given access to orgasmium, I'd probably be content living on it for the rest of my life. That doesn't change the fact that BEFORE having access to orgasmium, I simply prefer not to accept it, and instead create art and discover things. That's my personal preference.

I've actually considered that, even ignoring the orgasmium element, I could probably self modify into a person who doesn't care about accomplishing stressful art projects, who just does things that make him immediately happy. But my eventual response to myself: I'm the sort of person who prefers not to self modify into that kind of person. No, I don't need to be able to justify that to anyone else, I just need to feel that way.