You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

prase comments on Why No Wireheading? - Less Wrong Discussion

16 [deleted] 18 June 2011 11:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (112)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MrMind 20 June 2011 09:35:20AM 0 points [-]

I would expect that wireheading is right for either all or no humans and any other result needs a really good explanation.

As you know, we've already seen this statement, with "wireheading", with "increased complexity", etc.

Until we get a definition of meta-value and their general axiological treatment, people will always be baffled that others have different meta-values then theirs.