You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Desrtopa comments on Exclude the supernatural? My worldview is up for grabs. - Less Wrong Discussion

24 Post author: r_claypool 25 June 2011 03:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (92)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Desrtopa 25 June 2011 07:38:40PM *  4 points [-]

But that comes right back to the question of why consciousness has such a strong relation to the physical state of the brain. If consciousness is is fundamental and doesn't arise from anything else, why does it behave as if it's a function of the brain? For positing an additional entity of such complexity, it doesn't do a very good job explaining our observations.

Comment author: Peterdjones 26 June 2011 03:12:32PM 0 points [-]

Contemporary dualists are happy to accept that the Easy Problem aspects of consciousness have neurological explanations. The focus is on the Hard Problem aspect of qualia. Since sensory information is already present in the neurological account , the only gap that needs to be plugged is adding phenomenal feels to the existing information.