I think I'm right.
Don't be so quick to assume you are correct or rational just because your beliefs are within a particular cluster, no matter how accurate those beliefs seem at first. After all, the one of the virtues of rationality is to continue to be curious even after you think you've found the answer. You might even be wrong about ghosts (although that seems pretty unlikely). The point is, not all of the things that "skeptics," or "traditional rationalists" as they are often called here, believe are necessarily true. In fact, some of their epistemic standards are incorrect or too weak. Continue to question what you believe--if you put forth a genuine effort, I think you'll find that you still have some lingering irrational beliefs that can be corrected.
If you are already an atheist that does not believe in ghosts, what can you learn from rationality? I'd love to be wrong about lots of things but my problem is, I think I'm right.
As far as I can tell, none of this reflective thinking has lead to deeper understanding of consciousness. (A subject I wish I wasn't so interested in, because its study seems so futile).
If you feel like it, please tell me about any particular instances where actively working on your own thought processes has lead you to realize you were wrong about something (other than blatantly false things like those I mentioned above) or if the same program lead to any new understanding of consciousness.