You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

asr comments on Hanson Debating Yudkowsky, Jun 2011 - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: XiXiDu 03 July 2011 04:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: asr 04 July 2011 02:22:35PM *  4 points [-]

The first creatures to develop human-level intelligence came to dominate all other creatures.

I am not so confident of this. There were a bunch of early hominids, other than H. Sap, whose intelligence is not well established. Suppose, say, it turns out that Neanderthals were 7% smarter on average than modern humans, but lost out evolutionarily because they had too much body hair. What would that imply about the importance of intelligence?

Comment author: Vaniver 05 July 2011 03:27:48AM 0 points [-]

Actually, we have strong reason to suspect Neanderthals were smarter than Cro-Magnon man, and lost out because Cro-Magnon man traded and Neanderthals didn't.