= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
James_Miller comments on Is g a measure of ability to absorb information in a non-inductive way? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (20)
g is the ability to process complex information. It's certainly possible that if selection pressures caused improvements in the "math" part of brains but because of tradeoffs caused a decrease in the "hand/eye coordination" part of the brain then g as measured by intelligence tests would go up.
Sorry, this doesn't make sense to me. My objection is that the information processing doesn't have to be portable. If it's not portable, then it's not general. If it's not general, there's no g.
That's all.