You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Tetronian comments on [SEQ RERUN] Absence of Evidence Is Evidence of Absence - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: MinibearRex 17 July 2011 04:08AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (4)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 July 2011 04:35:58AM 6 points [-]

I think this is an amazing example of Bayesian methods being more precise and harder to abuse than the tropes of Traditional Rationality. I've mentioned this concept to a few friends and they didn't quite "get it" until I took the time to explain Bayes' Theorem.

On a related and shamelessly self-promoting note, this post inspired me to re-explain the concept here.